After spending a week in Bangalore, my preconceived notions of Hinduism are definitely in question. Since the Hindu texts are not available to the average Indian and since I was raised in a home that does not emphasize one specific religion, I have always been skeptical of what others believe are the fundamental principles of Hinduism. From the visits with the religious scholars at the monastery, I hoped to finally gain a firsthand account of the scriptures. While the monks did provide us with some insight on how to approach modern ethical and social issues using examples from the Vedas, ultimately, we are still interpreting the scriptures based on the assumption that God and human are separate according to this branch of Hinduism. If Hinduism does not agree on the relation of man to God or his position in the universe, then it is possible for two Hindus to have completely different perspectives/religions? Other popular religions also face similar problems with the interpretation of their sacred texts. Maybe that is why I (and others) have an issue with identifying with one religion. If there is so much flexibility (or maybe it’s just ignorance) in what one who identifies with one religion may choose to believe or prescribe to, then why label one’s beliefs?
On a lighter note, my favorite part about Bangalore: the auto rickshaw rides at night! Watching the city fly by with the wind blowing through your hair through the enclosed door-less windows is something I will never forget. When the drivers feel the need to rush and race, instead of closing my eyes and promising to never hop on one of these again, I secretly wish he would drive more recklessly. Again, the theme of India = nothing like I expected arises once again. Or maybe I never expected this personal reaction to India.